Skip to content
English
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

Do we need to carry out risk assessments for all sources of risk?

Short answer

No — you normally do not need to start by carrying out risk assessments for all sources of risk at once.
What matters is that you work in a structured way and prioritise the sources of risk that pose the greatest risk first.


Why not assess everything immediately?

Many organisations have a large number of sources of risk. If you try to assess everything at the same time, the result is often that:

  • the work becomes overwhelming

  • risk assessments become rushed or too generic

  • nothing gets completed

  • the biggest risks are not addressed in time

Instead, structured chemical management is based on:

  • starting with the most important risks and working step by step


What should be assessed first?

It is wise to start with sources of risk that:

  • are used frequently or in large quantities

  • are handled by many people

  • involve a risk of serious harm (e.g. corrosive, toxic, or flammable)

  • are used in work tasks with high exposure

  • have known incidents or recurring issues linked to them

  • are subject to specific requirements or permits


But do we need to assess everything in the long run?

Yes — the goal is to have risk assessments for the sources of risk and work tasks where risks actually exist.

However, this does not mean that all sources of risk require:

  • the same level of analysis

  • equally extensive documentation

  • their own Protective sheets

Some sources of risk may have a low risk level and therefore require fewer measures.


What happens if we do not assess a source of risk?

If a source of risk is used in the organisation and involves risks, but does not have a risk assessment, it may lead to:

  • protective measures being missing or incorrect

  • employees not receiving the right information

  • the organisation finding it harder to demonstrate systematic work

  • risks being discovered only after an incident occurs

That is why prioritisation is so important.


A good recommendation

A good approach is to:

  • map all sources of risk

  • select the most important risks (prioritisation)

  • carry out risk assessments for these first

  • expand gradually until you have a stable overall picture

  • follow up annually and update as needed